FOOTBALL Injury updates
- By Skunkpilot
- The Rock
- 25 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
You could be correct. My point is there is no loyalty from anywhere going forward. It will probably get worse before/ if it ever gets better.I would steer my son away from if he was a recruit. This guy has PJ written all over him. I believe after the honeymoon he eventually comes back to the norm and crashes.
Gambling is a source of revenue for state governments, and money has only one color.I don't disagree with that statement personally, but I will point out that this PARTICULAR issue doesn't much follow a standard left-right divide and you will find plenty of small-c-conservative change averse pearl clutchers in both parties on this particular issue.
That at hardball politics. We have a decent number of Republicans in MN who religiously oppose gambling and a decent number of Dems who oppose it based on what you're describing, but the big reason is the native tribes have a permanent gambling monopoly and are decisively powerful Dem funders. They haven't been able to iron out a final structure they like yet, so it's blocked cold. Very very close for a couple years now after a few years of hard opposition though.
I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other on this. While there are things about the two party system that are maddening, I also see other countries with multiple parties forming coalitions once elected. In a sense, you could argue that our system just forces them to build their coalitions before the election. But again, I would be open to hearing arguments for changing our two-party system.Your clarifications are correct. I was writing about legislators and executive branch - the politicians.
It is probably heresy to some, but we need more than two political parties.
Instead we're saddled with entrenched extremists on both sides who prioritize their uncompromising agendas (and themselves) ahead of the nation.
The first flaw to correct is to allocate the federal House of Representatives based on percentage of the vote for each party in each state.
This would enable minor political parties to establish a foothold in the largest states and go from there.
Of course, the two existing parties will never allow it - as the money pours in and they enrich themselves fighting the same stupid battles eternally, backed almost entirely by corporations and wealthy donors.
I don't disagree with that statement personally, but I will point out that this PARTICULAR issue doesn't much follow a standard left-right divide and you will find plenty of small-c-conservative change averse pearl clutchers in both parties on this particular issue.That's Progressivism in a nutshell: good vibes and good intentions, followed by craptastic ineffectual policy that just makes things worse.
No poor logic here. I'm enjoying winning basketball. The local team here won the first game of the next round and the other winner yesterday was led by UConn stud and true GOAT Breanna Stewart!Bias sometimes results is poor logic on a topic,
It’s very clear which side of the political spectrum pretty much every frequent poster lies on. So, this scope creep you talk about happens all the time. When I see people complain about the “ignorant” or “snarky” comments it is always misaligned with the complainers beliefs. Hardly a surprise. The political system has worked pretty well in this country up until the last couple of decades. Now it is about winning and towing the party line even if that isn’t what the people want. There are so many lies from all sides and promises that will never be kept that it nauseates a bunch of people. Hence, don’t like to talk about it.Let's make sure we're clear. Government is often incentivized (or better yet, forced) to be fiscally responsible. I have a government job and I absolutely can't spend past my budget. However, you are right that politicians aren't necessarily incentivized to be fiscally responsible.
I've often said that we have a terrible system where we allow our government to be run by politicians, but I can't think of a better way to do it.
Let's make sure we're clear. Government is often incentivized (or better yet, forced) to be fiscally responsible. I have a government job and I absolutely can't spend past my budget. However, you are right that politicians aren't necessarily incentivized to be fiscally responsible.
I've often said that we have a terrible system where we allow our government to be run by politicians, but I can't think of a better way to do it.
It was always only a matter of time imho. Once the summer league ended, there wasn't any other hoops to really talk about. It doesn't hurt that Clark is a phenom and it seems reasonable that she'll be talked about again on this board next summer.I for one will be relieved to have this board actually be about NU basketball again, rather than an overexposed Io_a alum.
I also picked up my parking tickets last week and thought the price was fairly steep. But since I'm driving in from the western suburbs generally towards the end of rush hour, I am willing to pay the price for the "guarantee" of a parking space in close walking distance.
I do wonder what the traffic will be like for conference games as the out of town folks stack up trying to buy game day parking, and theoretically being refused.