ADVERTISEMENT

New NIL commission coming?

I never said that or anything even close to it.

You seem to be very confused over my position on the matter. So here it is one more time:

To pay a college student, some as young as 18 years old, millions of dollars for having achieved nothing other than being very good at playing football, is morally wrong. It cheapens the value of the university system and upper education in general.

It is being done largely because college football brings in huge amounts of money and the people in charge need someplace to put the money. But that doesn't justify giving it to the student athletes. That money rightfully belongs to the university and is entirely fungible. It can be put to use in many different ways where it will serve a very good purpose for other students and causes.
Yeah, the university should be paid all the money off the back of the labor. Makes no sense.

Illinois signs Bielema to 6 year extension

Dislike him or not, Bielema can coach and he wins in the Big Ten with regularity and conviction.

Wonder if the contract has a poison pill to keep him from jumping to Iowa when Ferentz retires.

  • Love
Reactions: all4theillini

New NIL commission coming?

I never said that or anything even close to it.

You seem to be very confused over my position on the matter. So here it is one more time:

To pay a college student, some as young as 18 years old, millions of dollars for having achieved nothing other than being very good at playing football, is morally wrong. It cheapens the value of the university system and upper education in general.

It is being done largely because college football brings in huge amounts of money and the people in charge need someplace to put the money. But that doesn't justify giving it to the student athletes. That money rightfully belongs to the university and is entirely fungible. It can be put to use in many different ways where it will serve a very good purpose for other students and causes.
Amen!

New NIL commission coming?

So then I can only presume that it must be morally wrong for coaches to make their millions of dollars, and morally wrong for fans to pay money to attend sporting events, and morally wrong for university athletic departments to accept tens of millions of dollars from TV networks, and morally wrong for universities to build new buildings dedicated to athletic pursuits as well?
I never said that or anything even close to it.

You seem to be very confused over my position on the matter. So here it is one more time:

To pay a college student, some as young as 18 years old, millions of dollars for having achieved nothing other than being very good at playing football, is morally wrong. It cheapens the value of the university system and upper education in general.

It is being done largely because college football brings in huge amounts of money and the people in charge need someplace to put the money. But that doesn't justify giving it to the student athletes. That money rightfully belongs to the university and is entirely fungible. It can be put to use in many different ways where it will serve a very good purpose for other students and causes.

B Grade

Northwestern Wildcats

Grade: B

"An unofficial preseason media poll picked Northwestern to finish 16th out of 18 teams. The Wildcats avoided that projection, finishing in a multiteam tie for 12th place, but that's not the full story: Brooks Barnhizer (17.1 PPG, 8.8 RPG) and Jalen Leach (14.3 PPG), two of the team's top three scorers, missed 26 games combined because of injury. As a result, the Wildcats struggled in a strong Big Ten but still went 17-16 overall, securing a finish of .500 or better for just the 31st time in the program's 120-year history. That's why Chris Collins earned a lengthy extension when the season ended."

ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT