Sharing my own hypothesis on Schill's approach to things - based on a deeper dive on his background and some practical observations I've gained from dealing with lifelong academics who suddenly are tasked with the messy externalities of the real world. I'd like to know what you think.
First, Schill is a lifelong academic/thinktank guy. He was a law clerk and spent 2 years in a law firm - the short tenure in practice is first hint that he's not cut out for a world of practical realities or externalities.
1. Let's unpack what it really means to grow up in academia. Academia is a well-funded, political world in which posturing, jockeying, and positioning are essential, while publishing as much stuff as possible. It's not a place where there is a lot of accountability, focus on outcomes or regard for what's happening to real people in the real world. (No, publishing is not an outcome....). Having dealt with a lot of PHD's I find it remarkable how misinformed they can be, and how hard it is to get them to relate to business practicalities. It can take years to 'deprogram' the academic reflex so they can thrive in a business environment. They simply don't know what they don't know, because they've been so protected and insulated from externalities and because there are few good role models for leadership. So Dr. Schill is first and most a careerist who has clung to the insular comfort of academia - his bio makes that clear.
2. Why he hasn't flushed Gragg.
As much as we might think that is indefensible, we shouldn't assume that Gragg still has a job is about support or loyalty. There is a more Machiavellian angle that may explain it. If Schill moves fast, flushing Gragg, Foster, MacPherson, et all right away, he'll have no wiggle room left - no buffer. I suspect he knows that much more is coming. Keep people around = keep bullets in the chamber. Fire them at the right time to look responsive in the moment. They had to know about Foster but didn't do anything until they needed a bullet. Now, Shill waits for the next bombshell and he can fire another (MacPhereson?). Gragg will get his when something bigger emerges, when the legal groundwork is done, or at the end.
At that point, Schill will position himself with the board as the captain who navigated story waters.
Not a fan of Schill - I think he's a terrible President. But I think we underestimate him if we assume he's not playing some chess.