ADVERTISEMENT

Fans, Wildside, and Game Stuff

Here was my reasoning at the time.
If a player is facing trial for a felony, he should not be playing.
Its really easy and I stand by it - for all universities.
It has nothing to do with his guilt or innocence.
It is simply a matter of principle.

If you are charged with a felony, you should not be playing college sports while you await resolution.
Pretty simple, right?
Could it suck for the wrongly accused? Yes it could. Does it suck for the opposition if they're playing against somebody who is guilty of a felony? Absolutely.

If you really want to rage about it, talk to the (former) DA in Lawrence, Kansas.

Shannon is suing the Lawrence police department for $12 million, if that makes you feel better.
I agree with this, and when I said "fair game" above, I should note that there is a difference between "fair game" and "the right thing to do." I am ok with college kids chanting it even if I would not be comfortable chanting it myself as a mature man in his 50s. Students have a responsibility to get under the skin of opposing players by (almost) any means necessary. Part of the cost of playing big time basketball and part of the fun of attending as a fan.
 
Last edited:
I guess we’ll just have to disagree, lol. Your citing of colors seems to ignore than a little less than half of Illini fans seemed to be wearing navy around me. Lower bowl might have been 65/35 if you count the students but zero chance for non-student fans. And even if the math worked out for more NU fans overall, saying Illinois didn’t have a majority in the upper bowl is pure madness. Again, it was no less than 75%, dude. Either way, who cares? You earned the important thing - the W.

As for the person saying the chants toward Shannon were fair game at the time … seriously? The lesson learned is that you shouldn’t lazily assume someone’s guilt without a shred of evidence, not that you can immediately assume guilt until he can officially clear his name months later and privately apologize to yourself, lol. That kid endured incredibly classless treatment based on what turned out to be a ludicrous allegation with zero evidence, and he handled it with dignity and maturity all while being asked to carry his team on the court … as most who followed the case were saying from the start and were simply accused of being biased Illini fans. I’ll admit this forced me to reconsider how I now view these things when it will inevitably come to a rival team’s player, but those chants simply weren’t justified. Period. Your students chanted “Lock Him Up!” at an innocent college kid without even circumstantial evidence. 🤣 It’s an understandable thing to do at the time, sure, but if anything it highlighted an alarming number of Americans who IMMEDIATELY assume someone’s guilt based on an allegation … to double down on it after the exoneration is nuts.
I think that you surrender your privacy when you enter public life and is the only justification for being grossly overpaid. And you should not travel alone, not drive yourself, not put yourself in any position to even let these type of things develop. Millions of public without the problems Shannon faced. So he gets what he gets. Nobody said he had to be a basketball player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UpsetAlert
Illinois fans complaining about the propriety of Shannon chants rarely mention it was their administration who suspended him and that Shannon had to sue to be able to play. Complaining about student section chants a year later is stupid on a few levels.
 
I like nasty, aggressive chants, but I also want a little bit of subtlety. F U MILLER was funny, but I didn't like it because NU needs butts in the seats and I don't like anything that might discourage parents with kids from coming to games.

"SVU," "DUI," etc. were all great, fair game chants that didn't cross that line
 
  • Like
Reactions: UpsetAlert
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT