I don’t care how cynical you are - a 2 hour marathon is incredible to behold.
Whether you think you can, or you think you can’t - you’re right!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No performing-enhancing drugs, but sure enough, he's Kenyan. They do seem to have some sort of inherent advantage. Are they training at altitude at Mount Kilimanjaro or something?A two hour marathon is absolutely insane. And yes st.paul, the elite marathoners do get tested.
There are many really incredible athletes who wouldn't break five minutes for a single mile. The idea that someone is going to eventually run a sub-two hour marathon is crazy!Chicago is a great place to run a marathon in terms of altitude, and this year it was really nice and cool on race day.
What a great accomplishment and I can't wait to see someone shave 36 seconds off that time
From a few years ago, but yes, they tend to come from a high-altitude area:No performing-enhancing drugs, but sure enough, he's Kenyan. They do seem to have some sort of inherent advantage. Are they training at altitude at Mount Kilimanjaro or something?
And I was worried that I was going to be accused of exaggerating
From a few years ago, but yes, they tend to come from a high-altitude area:
I'd bet that if you tried to drive the marathon route today, with normal traffic and lights, you'd struggle to do it in two hours.You still said "well over 90%," so technically you're right. I can barely drive a mile in 4:36 (ok, THAT's exaggerating). If I ever ran one mile in 4:36 it would likely be the last mile I ever run. Or walk.
I hope when someone does it in under two hours someday it's treated like breaking the four-minute mile.
There are several animals that can out-sprint man over short distances, but in long, endurance runs, man is actually one of the top animals. At least, I read it on the Internet.I'd bet that if you tried to drive the marathon route today, with normal traffic and lights, you'd struggle to do it in two hours.
I agree and I still think it will happen. What's important is to start by telling athletes it's impossible to do.There are many really incredible athletes who wouldn't break five minutes for a single mile. The idea that someone is going to eventually run a sub-two hour marathon is crazy!
This is the same reason I've always believed there's no way Ferris Bueller could've done all that in one day and still make it home by like 5:30. Traffic would've been horrendous, especially given the Cubs game AND the parade.I'd bet that if you tried to drive the marathon route today, with normal traffic and lights, you'd struggle to do it in two hours.
Probably depends on the eventDo they test marathoners for performance enhancing drugs?
The Chicago Marathon is usually considered a big one, right?Probably depends on the event
Yeah, I was going to say: when I was in 8th grade Cross-country, running a mile in 6 minutes put you as one of the best in the whole state. So the number of people who could run a mile in 4:36 I’d imagine is 0.01% at best.I would guess the percentage of people in the world who could run a single mile in 4:36 is ~0.0001%. An estimate, of course.
There are several animals that can out-sprint man over short distances, but in long, endurance runs, man is actually one of the top animals. At least, I read it on the Internet.
Yeah, I was going to say: when I was in 8th grade Cross-country, running a mile in 6 minutes put you as one of the best in the whole state. So the number of people who could run a mile in 4:36 I’d imagine is 0.01% at best.
So what's different now?Not anymore. Now, every year there are at least fifty 8th graders just in Chicago and the suburbs running under 5 flat. Its shocking (to me), but there's always at least one precocious 8th grader running 4:30 or better. That's just ridiculous for a 14 year old.
Some of you old time track guys might remember this - back when I was in HS in the late 70s, there was a publication called "Timely Times", which was the source for Illinois HS track coaches. It listed roughly the top 75 performers in every event throughout the state, and came out weekly. I used to sneak into my coach's office and read it. Back then, 4:36 would be probably in the top 20 for milers by state meet time. Today, it wouldn't make the list (it would for small schools). There are easily 75 runners in Illinois every year running under 4:30 (and 20 or more getting under 4:20 - more amazing). You'd be extremely fortunate to qualify for the state meet running 4:36 (in 3A).
So 4:36 in the mile by any standard is a fabulous level of fitness, but its become very common in HS. Its amazing how many HS kids run that fast every year now.