I've been thinking about NU's struggles in recent years. NU has often lacked explosive playmakers at WR. The LBs have often been a step or two slow. The OL has often failed to get a big push or protect the passer. It's not like NU has always had a reliable kicker. Often we've clamored for the OC to be fired. Even in good years. Fitzgerald has won many, many games. What's the difference, then, between success and failure?
Well, you might say it's Hank. And I won't argue. JON has been a disaster. But I don't think that's the main reason.
NU for years benefited from consistent QB play. And many of those QBs have been mobile. Whether in HS recruiting or transfers, FItz has simply missed on way too many QBs. Thorson obviously stands out as an exception. Ramsey was a nearly ideal one-year fix. But the freshmen recruits have almost universally failed otherwise. It's not like they go on to success as transfers, either. And the transfers to NU haven't stood out either. Johnson looked like a program-changer—on paper. Hilinski just isn't accurate or mobile enough, and he turns the ball over too much. He can't make up for weaknesses elsewhere on the team.
I don't understand why Fitz can't seem to land anyone like Kustok/Baz/Persa/Bacher/Thorson any longer. But more than anything else, this position seems to define the major step back in this program for three out of the last four years. It's not like NU's QB play has been average. Often it's been among the worst in the nation, and I don't think improving the OL or WRs would make up that much difference compared to getting QB right. Something's fundamentally off in NU's evaluations. Recruits like Yates and Whittaker and Smith never seem to even have a chance at this level. I'm not blaming Fitz for missing on McCarthy, though I think NU would be a totally different program with him in the shotgun right guy. But it's not the guys NU misses that worry me. It's the guys who NU actually lands.
You can't be a developmental program when you don't know how to identify or develop reliable QBs.
Well, you might say it's Hank. And I won't argue. JON has been a disaster. But I don't think that's the main reason.
NU for years benefited from consistent QB play. And many of those QBs have been mobile. Whether in HS recruiting or transfers, FItz has simply missed on way too many QBs. Thorson obviously stands out as an exception. Ramsey was a nearly ideal one-year fix. But the freshmen recruits have almost universally failed otherwise. It's not like they go on to success as transfers, either. And the transfers to NU haven't stood out either. Johnson looked like a program-changer—on paper. Hilinski just isn't accurate or mobile enough, and he turns the ball over too much. He can't make up for weaknesses elsewhere on the team.
I don't understand why Fitz can't seem to land anyone like Kustok/Baz/Persa/Bacher/Thorson any longer. But more than anything else, this position seems to define the major step back in this program for three out of the last four years. It's not like NU's QB play has been average. Often it's been among the worst in the nation, and I don't think improving the OL or WRs would make up that much difference compared to getting QB right. Something's fundamentally off in NU's evaluations. Recruits like Yates and Whittaker and Smith never seem to even have a chance at this level. I'm not blaming Fitz for missing on McCarthy, though I think NU would be a totally different program with him in the shotgun right guy. But it's not the guys NU misses that worry me. It's the guys who NU actually lands.
You can't be a developmental program when you don't know how to identify or develop reliable QBs.