Or the ref has a friend with a sports betting account.Bad refing doesn't have to be just about bias. Sometimes it's just bad refing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or the ref has a friend with a sports betting account.Bad refing doesn't have to be just about bias. Sometimes it's just bad refing.
Sure is a lot of itBad refing doesn't have to be just about bias. Sometimes it's just bad refing.
For now the refs are letting the players be extremely physical. IMO IU is getting away with a lot, 3 less fouls than Purdue. Bit of a home bias going onPretty sure Green is one of the refs doing this Purdue @ Indiana game tonight.
Can he make it 3 for 3 this week in games where he almost personally decides the outcome??
Sounds like last night. RU was extremely physical on the D end and Iowa had 7 or 8 team fouls in the 2nd half before Rutgers was given their second foul.For now the refs are letting the players be extremely physical. IMO IU is getting away with a lot, 3 less fouls than Purdue. Bit of a home bias going on
Wisc missed both the FT’sCollege needs the replay challenge like the NBA has. We wouldn't have gotten the fastbreak points, but we would have avoided the Wisconsin free throws and had a jump ball.
And we missed the sure basket after the steal which resulted in lost time and points for the Cats.Wisc missed both the FT’s
For sure...and the Cats missed the incredible blocked shot that would have led to the sure three-pointer after the sure basket after the steal which resulted in lost time and points for the Cats.And we missed the sure basket after the steal which resulted in lost time and points for the Cats.
Chaos theory in all its glory. I am proud of how hard you worked on your sarcastic response. I must really have fired you up. 🔥🔥🔥For sure...and the Cats missed the incredible blocked shot that would have led to the sure three-pointer after the sure basket after the steal which resulted in lost time and points for the Cats.
But, not only that, the Cats missed the sure stolen inbounds pass after the sure three-pointer off the incredible blocked shot that would have led to the certain 360 windmill jam that would have happened after the missed block shot that led to the sure three-pointer after the sure basket after the steal...all of which resulted in lost time and points for the Cats. Cats actually won that game by 10.
Anybody who thinks Audige wouldn't have picked up that slowly rolling ball and dunked it is intentionally being a moron.Chaos theory in all its glory. I am proud of how hard you worked on your sarcastic response. I must really have fired you up. 🔥🔥🔥
Maybe he did by NOT being thereGreen took the night off, didn't strongly influence the final outcome this time.
Totally. And then we get the sure three-pointer off the obvious steal of the inbounds pass and we're on our way to that 10-point victory. I don't know why they even play the games. If the refs just weren't full of jealous rage against Northwestern (and Chris Collins played Matt Nicholson 35 minutes a game), the team would be undefeated.Anybody who thinks Audige wouldn't have picked up that slowly rolling ball and dunked it is intentionally being a moron.
So its 80-78 Wisconsin with 25 seconds to go and Wisconsin needs to get the ball inbounds as they are collapsing.
Or we can be idiots and pretend something else.
I'm just proud I was able to get a three-fire response from you. If only I had it in me to get a full four-fire, I could relax and focus on all of the ways the Cats are conspired against instead of all of the opportunities they let slip away.Chaos theory in all its glory. I am proud of how hard you worked on your sarcastic response. I must really have fired you up. 🔥🔥🔥
Was your dad a referee or something? I get your initial response earlier in the week when this topic was raging after the MSU game. Fine - disagree and present the other side. You did that. Clearly, people here want to continue venting on this topic whether because they really believe it or are just releasing some frustration, but I don't entirely get what you get out of this discussion other than just a reason to poke people.I'm just proud I was able to get a three-fire response from you. If only I had it in me to get a full four-fire, I could relax and focus on all of the ways the Cats are conspired against instead of all of the opportunities they let slip away.
I suspect it's a similar reason to the one that made you respond, but your point is well taken.Was your dad a referee or something? I get your initial response earlier in the week when this topic was raging after the MSU game. Fine - disagree and present the other side. You did that. Clearly, people here want to continue venting on this topic whether because they really believe it or are just releasing some frustration, but I don't entirely get what you get out of this discussion other than just a reason to poke people.
So, you think we're being silly. Fine. Roll your eyes and move on to the next thread. I don't see why you bother engaging if you think people are being ridiculous.
I suspect it's a similar reason to the one that made you respond, but your point is well taken.Was your dad a referee or something? I get your initial response earlier in the week when this topic was raging after the MSU game. Fine - disagree and present the other side. You did that. Clearly, people here want to continue venting on this topic whether because they really believe it or are just releasing some frustration, but I don't entirely get what you get out of this discussion other than just a reason to poke people.
So, you think we're being silly. Fine. Roll your eyes and move on to the next thread. I don't see why you bother engaging if you think people are being ridiculous.
While that's possible, I don't presume bad faith on the part of the refs. Even when I see evidence of bias, I expect it is largely unconscious on their part.Or the ref has a friend with a sports betting account.
Based on post history, this seems the primary motivator.what you get out of this discussion other than just a reason to poke people.
Because I appointed myself the moral authority of this board.I suspect it's a similar reason to the one that made you respond, but your point is well taken.
If it's not bad faith, then it's naked incompetence. Should be fired either way.While that's possible, I don't presume bad faith on the part of the refs. Even when I see evidence of bias, I expect it is largely unconscious on their part.
I'm talking about the obvious. Audige would have scored and cut the lead to 2.Totally. And then we get the sure three-pointer off the obvious steal of the inbounds pass and we're on our way to that 10-point victory. I don't know why they even play the games. If the refs just weren't full of jealous rage against Northwestern (and Chris Collins played Matt Nicholson 35 minutes a game), the team would be undefeated.
With all due respect, there are lots of different possible outcomes there.I'm talking about the obvious. Audige would have scored and cut the lead to 2.
Instead Wisconsin was up 4 and shooting free throws.
Sure, a squirrel could have run out on the court and tripped Audige, but if thats what you're relying on to continue your asinine narrative, then maybe take a step back and re-think it.