Some perspective here...
The Waterboy family has owned a residence at the SE corner of Livingston and Eastwood since 1984. Incidentally, that 3-trunk tree is on my property and is one of the largest maples in Evanston. At the time of purchase, I could only afford this residence because the house/property values in this neighborhood were 12-15% lower because of those 5-6 (now 6-7) home games per fall and the crazy stuff that occurs during EVERY home game. Since that time, NOTHING regarding property value appreciation has changed much simply because of all the abusive activity laid on property grounds and structures by the inebriated football fans (both home team & visitors). I have a LOT of war stories (which the UberCat tailgate population have heard ad nauseum) - all of which, unfortunately, are very true; and are highlighted by several nearly unimaginable red-letter examples which, over those 30-plus years, have formed the foundation of my enmity for all things done by HogEye, Wisky Drunkard & BuckNut fans - on top of my personal hatred of those teams borne from by my career as an NU athlete. Those examples and more are why there is a very visible Evanston police presence on game days - to try and prevent such abuses. And yet those abuses that keep property values reduced by double figures continue (like drunken fans who insist on pissing on the walls of garages and coach houses adjacent/near the alley instead of using the port-o-sans in the parking lot. Never could understand that choice. Over the course of the past 5 seasons, the cops have nabbed at least a couple fans per game "in the act". Two seasons ago, I caught and challenged a very inebriated fellow who was relieving himself on the back wall of my garage; and after I alerted the cops, this joker tried to out-run the cops bolting west on Livingston while he still holding his exposed package and eliminating himself in flight in front of scores of people leaving the game. Had to go to the police station and sign a personal complaint on this Mensa Man for trespassing on private property and destruction of property – all of which drew approximately $250 in fines from this idiot.)
The point is: NU announced to the neighborhood residents approximately 2 months ago what they planned to do and that NU had little to no interest in the opinions of those same residents either pro or con regarding their plans. That forced the neighborhood residents to band together into an association to air their grievances and offer alternatives to several less-than-friendly aspects of NU's rigid plans. One of the more crazy planned items was the afore-mentioned paving the alley just west of the west parking lot at the adjacent owners expense. I'm sorry, but if NU’s plans include changes to city of Evanston property, like paving an alley that NU doesn’t use - ever, then NU must foot the entire nut, period. My property doesn’t even use the alley, so an assessment to me is totally uncalled-for. Paving the alley is NOT an improvement to adjacent property - but is a modification to a city owned street/thoroughfare dictated by some NU planning committee who wanted to railroad the city and the residents into reducing their project costs. This item is a major sticking point and still under heavy debate. One item that the grievance meeting did resolve was to eliminate the access to the parking lot from Livingston via a portal through the proposed 6-ft high fence – and in doing so will eliminate 98% of those jack-holes who insist on relieving themselves against some alley-adjacent structure’s wall. Personally, I wanted the portal, but virtually every other resident decided that removing the portal was the best means to eliminate the heavy foot traffic which would be funneled to that portal point (and the associated property abuse by drunken fans). I capitulated on that one.