I never said they were making it up. What's apparent to me is that a small handful of players over a 20 year period when hundreds of players matriculated through NU's football program are now expressing concerns with how they were treated by other players in locker room hazing rituals that over the years went overboard particularly considering some of the changes in societal norms that have occurred over that 20 year period. What's also apparent to me is the catalyst for these complaints is a player that had an axe to grind against Fitz over playing time and I don't find it coincidental that the complaint was filed days after that player was passed over for the starting QB job by a 1st year walk on QB. What's also apparent to me is that some other accusers who subsequently emerged went years without expressing any concerns and in some instances continued to publicly praise their experiences at NU and with Coach Fitz. Lastly, what's also apparent to me is that Fitz continues to be revered by 95% + of the players that went through the program and that no one has provided one shred of evidence that Fitz knew of this conduct or condoned it. That to me and most other NU supporters is not conduct that justifies firing of a man who has done so much for NU, the players and staff that matriculated through NU's football program over an almost 20 year career as NU's head coach. Fitz deserved to be held accountable for what happened on his watch but he also deserved a chance to fix it.
Adding to posts that will not get relevant response: let’s say you are, just a handful. What’s the number of players hurt, damaged, etc that you find acceptable? What’s the percentage?
Seems to be as PFs football results diminished, whenever he would make dumb decisions like no two deep, no spring game, when he would snap at reporters - the big defenders would point to the perfect, clean program as the defense. Not just the greatest ambassador for the FB team or athletics, but the whole school as his defense.
And scandal from PSU, OSU, Jim Harbaugh - and these same people would pile on and stare loudly how lucky we are to never have to worry about that problem. Many would say, during down years, that success was far less important that running a clean program.
So what’s your number of acceptable damaged players? Who, ultimately, should be in charge of these young and immature players? Since a perfectly clean program no longer is your justification, can we go back to normal standards like team performance - if so, PF deserved to be fired last year, definitely by end of this season.
If you standard now is simply PFs historical value, JoePa says hi and most of you had very unkind things to say about legacy of a man…
There is another legal term - clean hands. Don’t get embattled if you have blemishes. PF chose his attitude, his coaching staff, everything and dared anyone to challenge him driving the program into irrelevance and back into dark ages. Sadly, he did so with dirty hands, fair he now be judged. And shown the door.