UNLV starting QB decides to redshirt after 3-0 start
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Well revenue sharing from the schools is starting within 2 years, so…Major college sports are breaking, and rather quickly. I’m just sad.
Probably going to be completely destroyed if/when players are all paid a salary directly by a school (currently delayed by the courts on a technicality but not indefinitely).
I don’t think anyone had any issues with players getting $ for LEGITIMATE NIL (jersey sales cut, appearance fees for speaking at school sponsor events, etc.) but these NIL “collectives” have gotten completely out of control with no signs yet that they’ll be reigned in.
The world we grew up in no longer exists 😢.
That’s usually the exact opposite of how it works: legalizing something typically takes it out of the weird back alleys. Why would big corporation fix something and risk their billions of publicly traded dollars? It’s not some scrub trying to rub a few grand together in South Bend, it’s guys in corporate America with regulators up their ass.If a student bookie out of Notre Dame was able to fix NU football and basketball games in the early ‘90’s, it will only get worse with the proliferation of legal gambling.
Gonna be toughWe “just” need to get to 6-6 and Detroit with this schedule after last year’s work. I’m not giving up on that yet but also realize we have zero margin for error now. Have to win the home games at the lake and at Maryland and at Purdue. Possible? Yes. Difficult? Hell yes. But if Cam comes back and Jack feels more comfortable after the bye we’ve at least got a chance.
To me, the problem is at QB. We've had some drops, but with a Bryant level QB, we're 4-0And, Northwestern looks worse than I expected. I expected some dynamism in the offense, but neither Henning nor Kirtz have made many plays, and the tight ends have regressed
If you use the Sargrin numbers the average is 20%. If you are going to do what you suggest you first have to take out the ones you really have no chance against. That leaves you with an average of 26% chance of winning each of the remaining games. That gives the potential of winning 1.56 additional games. Round up if you want but it puts the likelyhood at winning between 3 and 4 total games. Your 30% is high leading to the calculation of 2.4 additional wins putting us between 4 and 5 So you can either eliminate the 2 no chance games or use 20% rather than the 30%. number you are using are too high.I just chose 30% as a back of the envelope calculation because the math is easy. Obviously each game should have its own individual odds, some will be higher than 30% and some will be lower. The math just becomes more complicated. I was just trying to make the point that we're not expected to lose every single game, even if the other team is favored in all of them.
I wrote a program that can calculate it, if you assign each game a percentage. Somebody else here (@ricko654321 I think?) used to do Monte Carlo simulations, which doesn't calculate the "exact" number but gets you really, really close.
To clarify:
The calculation for expected number of wins is easy: it's just the sum of the probability we assign to winning each individual game. If each game is 30%, with 8 games remaining, then it's just 8 X 0.3. If we assign a different probability to each game, then sum them.
My program or the Monte Carlo simulations is required if you want to calculate the odds of bowling. What are the odds of winning 6 or more games? That calculation gets much more complicated.
There are (and already were) stipends in place for Big Ten athletes beyond their scholarships. These NIL payments are something else that come from third parties, not from the school.I'm confused about how all this works. Do the college players actually sign contracts?
Our grad students in my program here get a stipend and benefits. Though they are students and not employees, it is very much set up like an employer/employee relationship with a standard agreement. Not sure why this stuff with college athletes can't be more regulated and organized. No pro player would play without a contract.
It’s been so embarrassing that applications and donations have skyrocketed.
If a student bookie out of Notre Dame was able to fix NU football and basketball games in the early ‘90’s, it will only get worse with the proliferation of legal gambling.Gambling was illegal during all of that, so much good that prohibition did.
NIL deals would be typically contractually backed, yes. Your structure to maintain intern vs employee rules has very little bearing on a contract structured around selling of likeness and endorsement. I agree it makes zero sense Sluka didn't investigate this with the collective far in advance. It makes his agent look idiotic, although it isn't clear to me when exactly the agent was hired.I'm confused about how all this works. Do the college players actually sign contracts?
Our grad students in my program here get a stipend and benefits. Though they are students and not employees, it is very much set up like an employer/employee relationship with a standard agreement. Not sure why this stuff with college athletes can't be more regulated and organized. No pro player would play without a contract.
I'm confused about how all this works. Do the college players actually sign contracts?From what I've seen stupidity/culpability on the part of the Sluka campt too. Their claim is that the UNLV OC "verbally promised" him "at least $100,000" if he came to UNLV. Sluka, his family, and his agent's next act was to... enroll at UNLV and start (after finishing his degree at Holy Cross, missing spring practice). He didn't say okay, set up a meeting with the collective, he didn't ask to talk to the donors, he didn't even talk to the head coach.
Finally like months later they offered him $12,000 and he went to the head coach, who basically told him that whatever the OC said didn't count.
Even if it was the head coach, the head coach doesn't hold the check book and doesn't make the payment. You say okay, set up a meeting with the collective, are you allowed to attend? They're who you're actually directly dealing with. I understand the coach maybe has to commit to helping raise the money or whatever. But some OC says something verbally and you just act on that?
Stupidity all around.
It’s been so embarrassing that applications and donations have skyrocketed.“Increased the profile of the university” I guess is one way of putting it. Embarrassing the university is another (calling out the media, throwing the team under the bus when they lose, running off players). 4-8 last year and I predict the same this year.
Gambling was illegal during all of that, so much good that prohibition did.We NU fans had a taste of gambling changing outcomes in the ‘90’s. Dennis Lundy was caught up in that affair.
I wouldn't call myself an "avid" gambler. I love Vegas, which gambling is a solid part of, but my state still hasn't freaking legalized sports gambling so it's a pain in the ass to place wagers. I'll probably place a few a season once it's legalized. The casinos in my state also don't offer my favorite game so I almost never patronize them. I head to a neighboring state occasionally to sport gamble and play both of my favorite table games, but it's hard to find time with a family to do this too often.@AdamOnFirst , @Purple Pile Driver , were you avid gamblers prior to the launch of free, legal, online outlets?
I’ve had friends who regularly gambled through ‘their guy’ (I never investigated further), but it was mostly football Saturdays and Sundays, considered decisions, never spur of the moment. It was, say, part of the Friday afternoon routine. Weird, not my bag, but not particularly destructive or risky.
The primary problem with ‘the apps’ is that they’re so good at separating you from cash. Changing in-game odds, low-odd parlays, all built to make you feel good for making the bet, whether you win or not. So different from what it looked like ‘traditionally’.
I tend to come from the same place as @TheC*, where limitations on advertising, perhaps allowable bets per day, perhaps types of bets allowed on apps, would probably be good things.
*On most issues, I think I have a similar viewpoint to TheC, except that I don’t call for the OC, the DC, the Head Coach, the PA announcer, and the entire training and equipment management staff to be fired by the end of the first half. When the Cats are bad, it’s gallows humor for me only.
“Increased the profile of the university” I guess is one way of putting it. Embarrassing the university is another (calling out the media, throwing the team under the bus when they lose, running off players). 4-8 last year and I predict the same this year.First it was he was a bad coach and Colorado wouldn’t do anything.
Now it’s he’s going to abandon them for a big job because another school thinks he’s a good coach.
Even if he does leave, he’s increased the profile of the university, increased the number of black applicants substantially, and begun to turn around arguably the worst P5 program. You can hate his personality but it’s been quite the journey.
I doubt a larger program is poised to hire him at the moment and he absolutely hasn't achieved any kind of turnaround at Colorado as of yet.First it was he was a bad coach and Colorado wouldn’t do anything.
Now it’s he’s going to abandon them for a big job because another school thinks he’s a good coach.
Even if he does leave, he’s increased the profile of the university, increased the number of black applicants substantially, and begun to turn around arguably the worst P5 program. You can hate his personality but it’s been quite the journey.
Yes. Sagarin has us like exactly tied with UCLA but I think we're better. At least we have half of a competent team.You think we're better than UCLA?