This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

NURoseBowl said:

Absolutely. So go out and, y'know, EARN IT.

Click to expand...

QB is unique in that only one plays. The problem is that generally it isn't a fair competition so if the kid sees the path is blocked in any way, he needs to move to somewhere it isn't. Does not have the time to wait around because there is someone is always a bigger better deal coming in. Just look at all the NU QBs that come in never really got the chance to play

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Purple Pile Driver said:

Bert has done a good job and deserves credit. However, it is still Central Illinois!

Click to expand...

They have done quite well in the transfer portal they will be tough next year for sure

Sheffielder said:

Agree. I always considered Illinois to be a sleeping giant and just thought it was funny how they kept misfiring. Let's hope we haven't effectively flipped the script.

Click to expand...

Bert has done a good job and deserves credit. However, it is still Central Illinois!

Eurocat said:

Saints request interview with Giants' Mike Kafka for head coaching position

The New Orleans Saints have requested an interview with New York Giants AHC/OC Mike Kafka for their vacant head coaching position.

giantswire.usatoday.com

Click to expand...

Great to see. He’ll have the crappy NYG experience behind him soon just like Saquon Barkley 🤘

loyolacat said:

So the target has changed....used to be " yeah I was on the football team at Milford High and got a scholarship at State U...had a great time, meet some great friends, got a diploma, worked my butt off in two a days....in 98 we beat Better State U...great experience, great memories"....wear your jersey around the neighborhood.... Now it is I need a path to the pros..one way or the other.

Click to expand...

Getting to the pros pays a LOT more than it did back them.

NUCat320 said:

Right. Except there’s nothing that says the MSU transfer who hardly played as a freshman was better than the returning ASU freshman who hardly played as a freshman. Similar recruiting rankings. Dillingham was the head coach who signed Rashada.

Unless Dillingham said ‘the job’s not yours’, why not compete at ASU?

It’s pretty wild. Bad advice all over the place. Maybe the NCAA will be forced to offer unlimited eligibility as long as you’re ’making progress toward a degree’.

Rashada might be a 28-year-old redshirt freshman just trying to crack the lineup at Baylor in 8 years. Stack that paper.

Click to expand...

If he can get paid everywhere it can be a nice living

Sheffielder said:

Yes, I am cautiously optimistic that a completely different kind of approach to recruiting at NU - where we value player development and continuity - will yield very good returns as it historically has over typical higher-profile "hat dance" kids who wind up bouncing around four times in four years to never find what they're looking for, while those programs experience high turnover and unmet potential.

Our stated NIL strategy - to retain rather than recruit - will also hopefully help protect us from poaching and kids looking for greener pastures after a good season.

Click to expand...

Only if we can keep them in the fold. If they keep leaving with one or two years of eligibility remaining it does not work so well, Especially since they often are more developmental projects that take an extra year or so of development to be effective

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

EvanstonCat said:

It was clear that Bielema going to Champaign wasn’t a good thing for Northwestern. They will be good as long as he is there.

Would be great if we could get good again at the same time and make the rivalry something truly meaningful.

Click to expand...

Agree. I always considered Illinois to be a sleeping giant and just thought it was funny how they kept misfiring. Let's hope we haven't effectively flipped the script.

Alaskawildkat said:

This is where the NCAA dropped the ball. Something like this could well have worked before all the horses left the barn. (I suggested something similar when NIL was looming but of course NCAA wasn't mining the Rivals Boards then and your idea will also likely be left wafting in the wind.

Click to expand...

I go back and forth on this. Yes, I 100% agree that the NCAA overplayed its hand and left ZERO goodwill to negotiate where the sport could go from ZERO compensation. But I also think, even if the NCAA had negotiated in extremely good faith and willfully opened the doors to paying players, we always would've had lawyers and legislators arguing the legality of limiting an individual player's right to do (and earn) infinitely.

The same is true for @FanatiCat 's suggestion that the money be put into a trust - probably a good idea, but you'd always have a player or a player's greedy parent/lawyer/agent challenging the legality of regulating how a (theoretically) sane, competent adult's earnings should not be restricted for any reason.

Honestly, I think the best back-door solution to nonstop transferring is placing academic restrictions on process. If you want to limit a player's ability to transfer every time he's not named the starter, then you can do it through the admissions office and audit every kid's ability to earn his degree with so many disparate credits that lead to nowhere. The main issue here is this must be decided and agreed upon by member schools with an independent clearinghouse (which, honestly, the NCAA could probably establish and operate), so when Ohio State sees a great QB they want going on his fourth time transferring, they can't just waive him through to benefit their own agenda - in this case, the kid in question might be stuck somewhere until he reaches a point where he's made enough academic progress to be viable for a degree elsewhere, or complete his degree and then transfer as a grad. Imagine that - put the "college" back into college football.

Catreporter said:

I remember Washington having a very strong game in the otherwise ugly performance against Illinois in 2022. He probably left partly because he didn't know who the quarterback would be in 2023.

Click to expand...

I’m excited about his career in Miami, especially now that Hill has asked out. I think he’s gonna feature a lot more next season.

Smolmania said:

Are you sure that the visit was to Clemson? I thought they went to see Rich Rodriguez at West Virginia to learn about that spread offense?

Click to expand...

Yes it was Clemson. Woody Danztler was the QB then. Up until then, Purdue was spearheading the spread as a passing offense (SI even ran a two-page photo showing how wide their receivers were set up across the field). Clemson was using dual threat QBs and we built off them; the visit was widely publicized and included in several articles about us as our successes mounted.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Purple Pile Driver said:

It’s becoming pretty apparent that in these B1G games we need Berry to contribute. Generally, If Ty plays well we win, if he plays poorly we lose.

Click to expand...

Beyond apparent. To illustrate how bad he has been, here are Ty’s numbers against teams that are NOT:
Lehigh (Kenpom 258)
UIC (173)
Eastern Illinois (333)
Montana State (188)
Pepperdine (200)
Northeastern (195)

11-39 from 3 (28%)
2 rebounds per game
1.1 assist per game
1.3 steals per game
5 points per game
24 minutes per game

That’s just bad against the non cupcakes. If you remove the Iowa outlier he’s 6-30 from 3. And he was bad against a bunch of the cupcakes too.

Not sure what else can be said at this point: he needs to be better.

GatoLouco said:

Point is I am not a part of the panic of OMG they will guard Barnelli with 3 players. It was expected, everyone adjusts positioning to the strong points on the other side.

Click to expand...

I don't think Barnhizer and Martinelli were ready for what Purdue was doing - and the turnovers reflected that.
It looked to me that Barnhizer became the primary ballhandler and Purdue was bringing help much earlier than previous opponents, so that Barnhizer had to give up the ball or shoot midrange jumpers against pressure.

Martinelli only managed 8 shots in 35 minutes - making 2.

To me that is cause for concern. Doesn't mean we're doomed because Purdue is really well coached and we couldn't guard Smith with our rotation. We'll see how upcoming opponents attempt to defend us.

Windham at the point for 15 minutes a game is one possibility. In that scenario either Leach or Berry is the shooting guard and the other is getting a rest. They are somewhat redundant as Leach finds it more difficult to penetrate against BigTen defenses. Windham could take much of the ballhandling burden off Barnhizer.

Another option is Ciaravino in for Berry or Leach to provide more size and athleticism. Maybe he takes minutes from Mullins when Hunger is out there as well - although we could get shredded defensively as Ciaravino learns.

We need to find some combinations that work - and if that means taking minutes from Berry, Leach and/or Mullins, so be it.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.