ADVERTISEMENT

UNLV QB takes redshirt due to NIL dispute

The coach cannot promise NIL payments. NIL are third-party payments for the right to use a player's name, image, and/or likeness. They are not payments from a school or a coach in exchange for playing.

If the coach was promising such things, I think that's probably against the law.
Here is some info that includes that

Where we stand post-Washington debacle

Hilinski was named backup quarterback prior to the start of the 2019 season. His first game appearance came during the 2019 Belk Kickoff Gameagainst North Carolina after then starting quarterback Jake Bentley was injured in the game. Hilinski was named starting quarterback later that day. He made his first starting appearance in the second game of the season, a 72–10 win over Charleston Southern. With Hilinski starting, the Gamecocks would set a school record 775 yards of offense, as well as a school record 493 rushing yards. Next week, Hilinski would start in a home game against the Alabama Crimson Tide, a 47–23 loss, where he would complete more passes against Nick Saban's Crimson Tide than any other freshman quarterback

I don’t know what Bajakian did to him, but freshman Hilinski looked like he could ball and help us this year.
Maybe we don't have their O Line of receivers

OT: No more statements from Northwestern on geopolitics

FIRE ranks NU very low (238 / 251) on free speech. Harvard is last. The Ivies and other academic elites generally rank low in the FIRE rankings.

NU ranks very low on tolerance of conservative viewpoints. For example, on May 2, 2023, the Northwestern University College Republicans hosted political commentator James Lindsay on campus. The day after, Northwestern’s student government voted to freeze funding for the group, including funding needed to pay for the security for the event, in reaction to flyers promoting Lindsay’s appearance, which the student government claimed violated Northwestern’s policy prohibiting discrimination and harassment. Irony.

So NU can only get better.

This part caught my attention:
"Dialogue is not domination or denigration. Shutting down or shouting down a speaker with whom one disagrees not only demonstrates a refusal to listen but also prevents others from doing so."

This admission seems to be a step in the right direction. Cancelling people with dumb opinions is stupid.

As far as taking a public political stance, this became a "thing" as faculty have morphed from researcher - teachers to activists. My personal belief is that this strays from the central mission of pretty much any university. It is one thing to teach your students how to evaluate a policy position (and its alternatives), communicate it, defend it, and work to advance it. It is another thing for the institution itself to take an active role in pushing students to advocate for specific policies on campus to support faculty aims.

As many schools (and commercial enterprises) have found out, taking a stance on a controversial issue is not always beneficial. I never understood why higher education and corporations felt so compelled to get involved in these issues at an institutional level.

University of Chicago has done a great job of staying above the fray. Not perfect, but they have always kept their mission intact.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT