Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really like the transfer pieces we added. Preston is much more versatile than what we had last year and Landborg is a real plusWe were a #7 in the tourney, that translates for #25 to #28 as the NCAA saw us at the end of last year. And, yet...
Wisconsin - did not lose much talent, but did not add much at all. Yet most analysts picked them above us
Ohio State - was a disaster last year. Talent on paper is not better, same as WI and were often picked above us
Indiana - was, more often than not, picked above us.
And so on... and so on... and we were supposed to be 8th or 9th in the conference.
It's all very hard to predict. We lost one player, a very good one, but so did others. Indiana lost NBA talent, so did Ohio State. So why were we not on anyone's radar? They all believed the ceiling of the players in other teams was higher than for ours'. They would all get better at a higher rate than ours.
What is reality going to be? TBD. I like what we have.
Seems about rightAndy Katz has us as the 27th best team in the country.
The hype is slowly building…
That really is the swing of last year, and it will always be crazy to me.So there is the optimist's side that said "Second! Yeah!" and the pessimist's side that said "but we were almost ninth."