I don’t disagree. I like we’re football is. I like where basketball is going, but I do think we need to hang on to Collins.But several other 9- and 10-win seasons that are nevertheless quite impressive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t disagree. I like we’re football is. I like where basketball is going, but I do think we need to hang on to Collins.But several other 9- and 10-win seasons that are nevertheless quite impressive.
I agree that admissions decisions need to be made on an individual basis, and I am very certain that they are. Grades, which reflect achievement, and test scores, which reflect ability, are not absolutely accurate determinants of academic success in college. But, they are the best indicators that we have. Hard work and character are better predictors of success after school than of success in school. As a professor for many years, I can say that the major difference between a school such as NU, Duke, or Stanford and schools such as Illinois State, for example, is the relative similarity in the abilities of the students. The top 5% of students are roughly the same at every institution. The difference is in the next 95%. At NU, there is very little difference between the top 5% and the bottom 25% of the student body. At a school like Illinois State, there is most likely a huge difference. Professors generally teach to the 65th or 70th percentile. Vocabulary, complexity of arguments, reading assignments (both length and sophistication), the amount of time devoted to reviewing materials and repeating emphases, and a host of other considerations are influenced by the nature of the students at the 65th - 70th percentile. No professor wants to talk over the heads of his students. At NU this rarely happens because even the worst students are quite bright, sophisticated, and accomplished. Admitting students who cannot reasonably understand lectures, reading materials, and discussions, just to win a few more basketball games, is grossly unfair to those students - not to mention the faculty and other students.
I look at it from wakes perspective. Collins record in BIG is 43-87, with a last place and next to last place finish past 2 years (and a likely lady place finish if they have a 20-21 season. How in the world do you sell that to your fan base?
Likely last place finish in 20-21? I will take that action. Name your price.
Likely last place finish in 20-21? I will take that action. Name your price.
My point is that the discrepancies in admissions criteria between our athletes and the other students are not nearly as great as some people here may perceive. Of course, there may be some variances, but as I said earlier, admissions are made on the basis of personal evaluations considering more than just grades and test scores. That is true of all NU admissions, not just athletes. Clearly, we are only admitting students, including scholarship athletes, whom we believe can succeed at NU. That is great. The sense I have from some posts is that certain fans want to admit athletes whom our admissions people do not believe could succeed. That, in my opinion, would be a mistake and would rob NU of its special character. As an aside, my great friend for almost 50 years went to UW, but has come to know many NU alums both through me and by working in Chicago. He has repeatedly said that the admissions department (Shep Shanley years) did an unbelievable job in admitting great people. They may have been smart, but they were also fun and of high character. I hope that never changes.I am not following this train of thought. If at NU there is very little difference between the top 5% and the next 95%, how are the athletes supposed to engage with their classmates if they don’t fit in that profile? Are you saying there is little difference between the admitted athletes and the general population?
I would bet our admitted athletes test score/GPA wise and no better than the average student at ISU. How do almost all of them seem to graduate? Tutors? If so, I see no issue with that as long as they complete the work. The big question to me as an athlete would be how do I with my 21 ACT fit in with the rest of the student body?
My point is that the discrepancies in admissions criteria between our athletes and the other students are not nearly as great as some people here may perceive. Of course, there may be some variances, but as I said earlier, admissions are made on the basis of personal evaluations considering more than just grades and test scores. That is true of all NU admissions, not just athletes. Clearly, we are only admitting students, including scholarship athletes, whom we believe can succeed at NU. That is great. The sense I have from some posts is that certain fans want to admit athletes whom our admissions people do not believe could succeed. That, in my opinion, would be a mistake and would rob NU of its special character. As an aside, my great friend for almost 50 years went to UW, but has come to know many NU alums both through me and by working in Chicago. He has repeatedly said that the admissions department (Shep Shanley years) did an unbelievable job in admitting great people. They may have been smart, but they were also fun and of high character. I hope that never changes.
This is all so reminiscent of the story of Tommy Amaker way back when interviewing for the NU job. He brought 3 transcripts of players and asked NU these are priority recruits if I get the job could I offer be sure these 3 could be admitted. Admissions said no - the three players who's names had been altered on the transcript were Christian Laettner, Bobby Hurley and Marty ClarkWord is that James Naismith wanted to commit to NU but didn't have the grades, Henry Bienen wouldn't budge, and Carmody wasn't even on campus when Naismith visited.
I wonder why it's reminiscent.This is all so reminiscent of the story of Tommy Amaker way back when interviewing for the NU job. He brought 3 transcripts of players and asked NU these are priority recruits if I get the job could I offer be sure these 3 could be admitted. Admissions said no - the three players who's names had been altered on the transcript were Christian Laettner, Bobby Hurley and Marty Clark
I feel like it’s a better story when Marty Clark’s name is omitted, which is how I heard it circa 2000.This is all so reminiscent of the story of Tommy Amaker way back when interviewing for the NU job. He brought 3 transcripts of players and asked NU these are priority recruits if I get the job could I offer be sure these 3 could be admitted. Admissions said no - the three players who's names had been altered on the transcript were Christian Laettner, Bobby Hurley and Marty Clark
thewildcat2011 said:
↑
It is centered at a board of trustees who do not want to, or know what it takes to, build a consistently successful program at a P5 level. Yes, this bleeds into admissions decisions, resource allocation, etc.
Collins is only operating with one hand behind his back because Phillips is an absolute master and untied the other hand by getting the facilities done. Phillips is by far the best athletic director in the country with what he has done at NU. The athletic department is very steady and very good, but there are institutional barriers that they simply can’t remove.
We can’t understate how absolutely lucky we are to have Fitz, that he was a big time player for us and a proud alum...he would not have stayed here otherwise. No coach would have the patience to deal with this group of numbskulls otherwise. Also, don’t forget that he has also used other jobs as leverage to get what he needed from the admin.
If there is a 20-21 season, there is no way we finish last. This team is ready to break out.
Grant Hill and Christian Laettner. Enuf said. They both were interested in NU when I was a student. I was told they didn't qualify academically. If they had, we might have become the Duke's of basketball.I'd LOVE to know the list of who didn't pass admissions. Maybe an all-time list?
But then again, maybe I wouldn't.
Yeah, I'll take a piece of that too.Likely last place finish in 20-21? I will take that action. Name your price.
What I’ve heard is that every great Duke player starting with Jay Bilas and continuing to Chris Duhon preferred Northwestern but couldn’t get in. Also, Elton Brand had assured KON that the NU degree meant a ton to him, but that the Duke degree didn’t, so we would have gotten four years out of him. KON fled for the NBA out of frustration.Grant Hill and Christian Laettner. Enuf said. They both were interested in NU when I was a student. I was told they didn't qualify academically. If they had, we might have become the Duke's of basketball.
No Wednesday game, Styre. Shouldn't even be on the fence for it.I doubt they finish last - hell, they went 8-23 this year and didn't finish last - but I also doubt they get out of playing on BTT Wednesday.
What I’ve heard is that every great Duke player starting with Jay Bilas and continuing to Chris Dijon preferred Northwestern but couldn’t get in.
Ok, Nebraska might be worse. I’ll take last and next to last. $50If there is a 20-21 season, there is no way we finish last. This team is ready to break out.
How many BIG games do they win? More than 5?I doubt they finish last - hell, they went 8-23 this year and didn't finish last - but I also doubt they get out of playing on BTT Wednesday.
Easy bet. I’d easily take that.Ok, Nebraska might be worse. I’ll take last and next to last. $50
How many BIG games do they win? More than 5?
Hopefully he has $50 for a lot of us.Easy bet. I’d easily take that.
My point is that the discrepancies in admissions criteria between our athletes and the other students are not nearly as great as some people here may perceive. Of course, there may be some variances, but as I said earlier, admissions are made on the basis of personal evaluations considering more than just grades and test scores. That is true of all NU admissions, not just athletes. Clearly, we are only admitting students, including scholarship athletes, whom we believe can succeed at NU. That is great. The sense I have from some posts is that certain fans want to admit athletes whom our admissions people do not believe could succeed. That, in my opinion, would be a mistake and would rob NU of its special character. As an aside, my great friend for almost 50 years went to UW, but has come to know many NU alums both through me and by working in Chicago. He has repeatedly said that the admissions department (Shep Shanley years) did an unbelievable job in admitting great people. They may have been smart, but they were also fun and of high character. I hope that never changes.
Admissions discrepancies between "regular students' and scholarship student athletes are vast.
But somehow they graduate, despite that vast gap
This is false. My understanding is the threshold for ACT scores for basketball/football is ~24. The average for NU as a whole is 33. (It’s out of 36.)
Isn't that entirely what the current basketball team is made up of? Tell me which lazy, low-character brainiacs we should kick off the current team to make room for these superstars trying to break down the doors to take NU to the final four.Yes, and some of us believe that high-character kids who are hard workers but might not quite reach the GPA/SAT threshold should be given a chance to succeed at NU, with eyes wide open to the academic and athletic expectations.
Yes, and this year 7 wins would have put you in 13 place.6 or 7? Purdue won 9 this year and still played on Wednesday.
I thought they’d be looking at him, as well as other big up and comers. Much easier sell than Collins. If he fails, at least he was an hire that made sense on paper.Steve Forbes from East Tennessee State was hired to replace Manning.
If there's still NU basketball in 20 years, we'll probably still be debating admissions standards. Everyone agrees the requirements should be, and are, vastly lower than they are for the general student population. And this gap has only widened as NU has become far more selective overall since 1995. We disagree on the extent to which they should be lower, and whether they should be higher than our competitors, whether in the Big 10 or among similarly positioned private universities that compete at the highest level of athletics.
My main point is that there is nothing new to this discussion. Collins knew this when he arrived. If he didn't, then he has only himself to blame. We all know the Amaker story. Surely Collins has learned the situation by now. If he's concluded that he can no longer win at NU for this reason, and he's seeking other jobs or at least floating his name for them, then It's not tenable for him to stay. I hope he still wants to be here and believes he can win here.
... and he's seeking other jobs or at least floating his name for them ...
I take away only one thing from yesterday's Facebook interview. He's not shopping around.
This might be too incredibly simplistic, but nobody who wants to win employment - especially against a younger group - grows a gray corona goatee.
That's a guy who's comfortable.