From what we've observed about Fitz, Turk's observation is a reasonable hypothesis, although perhaps a bit extreme. These are my opinions: 1) Fitz is stubborn. If you disagree, you can ignore the rest of the post. 2) He hired JON because he knows and trusts him, despite his checkered past performance. 3) Our defense against P5 opponents, two of which are terrible teams, was the arguably the worst Fitz's tenure. 4) Some of the poor performance can be attributed to new people, some can be attributed to the scheme being new, and, IMHO, a large portion can be attributed to casual observation that the new scheme just hasn't worked - here or anywhere - prior to this. 5) There was a great wailing and gnashing of teeth amongst the pitchfork populace (us and others like us - the handful of NU fans that actually give a sh1te). 6) Fitz doubles down, as he always does, with 'my emails is hashtag i don't care' 7) some player representatives approach him with their concerns, and unlike us weirdos, he actually listens to them 8) Fitz does a Ryan Day/Kerry Coombs thing, under the radar and 4 weeks late.
No way, in my mind, does JON suddenly abandon all he, ahem, "knows" and re-install his predecessor's defense during a bye week. Just my opinion, everybody's got one, as they say. I don't need to be "right" about this, I just want the defense to tackle people. I don't care if Clucko the Chicken is the DC.