Michigan sophomore quarterback JJ McCarthy beat out last year's Big Ten championship quarterback Cade McNamara based on his early season performance in games against Colorado State, Hawaii, and Connecticut. It's a moot point now with McNamara out hurt. However, is that slate of teams a good judge of how well a quarterback would fare against Big Ten competition? I'm not sure Jim Harbaugh went through the right progression in how he replaced his top quarterback. McCarthy has Michigan leading, but struggling to pull away from Maryland. I'm just wondering if that line-up of Colorado State, Hawaii, and Connecticut is just one of the softest non-conference schedules for a powerhouse program like Michigan to face, for it to be a good way of deciding to dethrone a team captain quarterback who took you to your first Big Ten championship in almost two decades. It would be like picking a new kid to be the class math whiz based on an arithmetic test, while previous class math whiz had proven themselves in the past going up against calculus and differential topology.