Montre apparently improved on his time at today's pro day. Fitz said he had him at 4.45 but that was unofficial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Montre apparently improved on his time at today's pro day. Fitz said he had him at 4.45 but that was unofficial.
Bad advice from his agent.Much better... almost like maybe he shouldn't have put the 4.68 out there, eh?
Bad advice from his agent.
I wish 40s were like the SAT scores or snowboard half pipe runs.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯Hmm... where might I have heard that before...
Much better... almost like maybe he shouldn't have put the 4.68 out there, eh?
I thought it was unofficial.Who's to say he would have run a 4.45 on the pro day without running first at the combine? What if the only time he ran, he ran a 4.68 and he waited until the pro day to run it? That would have been a really bad result.
Glad to see he had what appears to be a better time in the pro day. That gives teams something to believe in if they like him otherwise.
Who's to say he would have run a 4.45 on the pro day without running first at the combine? What if the only time he ran, he ran a 4.68 and he waited until the pro day to run it? That would have been a really bad result.
Glad to see he had what appears to be a better time in the pro day. That gives teams something to believe in if they like him otherwise.
I am sure he figured two tries were better than one Montre has been nursing his injury for quite a while. Some acting as though an injury he's been nursing for months miraculously got better in a week to fit what they said as being correct is rediculous Running it at the combine evidently didn't reinjure or aggravate his injury so running it twice only benefited him Montre decided to run it twice so it would appear his decision paid off . Congrats to Montre for having faith in himself and doing what he needed to do to acheive his goals. The 4.6 he ran doesn't hurt him at all if he officially ran a 4.4 at Pro Day If a poster is going to claim he is right because the decision of the player (which he said made a mistake running twice) paid off, what can anyone say? If he ran slower same poster would claim it was from running twice. Some people have to always be right I personally could not care less of who was correct I am just extremely happy Montre choices paid offWho's to say he would have run a 4.45 on the pro day without running first at the combine? What if the only time he ran, he ran a 4.68 and he waited until the pro day to run it? That would have been a really bad result.
Glad to see he had what appears to be a better time in the pro day. That gives teams something to believe in if they like him otherwise.
We know he was running hurt at the combine. We know he had some time to heal before the pro day. We know he ran faster at the pro day.
This isn’t hard.
My son hung out with Montre most of last quarter. Montre played a good portion of the season injured. But you are correct on this post Nobody knows how he felt on combine day and his thought process. He may have felt 100 % on Combine Day If he did indeed run a 4.4 at pro day then his decisions paid off It is easy for some on here to spin anything they want in a negative light then claim they were correct no matter how it turned out Montre is one of the hardest working and best teammate to ever wear purple He will help out anyone who comes to him for help. I am hoping his pro day was as successful as posted. Most the players I have talked to said if they felt well at the combine they would have run twice as to give themselves two bites at the apple I also asked a scout and he agreed he should run twice if he couldHow do we know he was running hurt? How do we know that he was healed up? We don't even know that he officially ran a faster time.
It's much harder than you think. Understanding the difference between what you know and what you "know" is a crucial skill.
I just hope that Montre put up a good enough time to get strong consideration from NFL teams if that's his focus.
My son hung out with Montre most of last quarter. Montre played a good portion of the season injured. But you are correct on this post Nobody knows how he felt on combine day and his thought process. He may have felt 100 % on Combine Day If he did indeed run a 4.4 at pro day then his decisions paid off It is easy for some on here to spin anything they want in a negative light then claim they were correct no matter how it turned out Montre is one of the hardest working and best teammate to ever wear purple He will help out anyone who comes to him for help. I am hoping his pro day was as successful as posted. Most the players I have talked to said if they felt well at the combine they would have run twice as to give themselves two bites at the apple I also asked a scout and he agreed he should run twice if he could
No matter how Montre ran at Pro Day it would have been proof GCG was correct It is hard knowing what is going on with the program and see someone stating false opinions that are wrong and acting like they are facts. They are usually negative too. Watching my son go thru football and NU scholastica makes me truly appreciate these young men Their workload is very demanding. I wish all of them nothing but successI hear you. Just was curious how GCG was justifying "knowing" Montre ran hurt while ignoring the other insights you offered.
All that said, I hope he ran a great time at his Pro Day and that he has the career that he wants. It's been a real pleasure watching him play.
Hope the official time from the scouts matches that! Would be huge if so!! Go Montre, we are cheering for you.Montre apparently improved on his time at today's pro day. Fitz said he had him at 4.45 but that was unofficial.