ADVERTISEMENT

Recruiting Braun vs. 51

Baz=Heisman

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2023
439
458
63
I keep hearing grumblings from Wildcats Twitter/X that Fitz was a way better recruiter than Braun. That is simply spin.

I checked and Fitz had classes in the 50-55 range for the most part per Rivals (one of the last 6 years was 42, I believe). Braun’s 2025 class, his first full one, is currently 59. Is that really that much of a difference?

With our stringent academic restrictions I’m guessing, realistically, the high 30s/low 40s composite score is about as good as we can do. Not saying Braun will for sure get there but we’re not far off already…

Curious everyone’s thoughts.
 
For 90% of his tenure Fitz didn’t have to recruit against open money offers in the table. The “4 years for 40,” honoring scholarships through graduation etc. is not a big deal anymore.
 
Big recruiting year coming up.....AI picture of the new stadium with recruit scoring a TD or a sack...with Taylor Swift and notable NU grads in the stands.....Do we put Fitz in the crowd?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baz=Heisman
Fitz had a pretty good-looking class on board when he got canned. Obviously, ratings mean little, but it was a good group on tape.

Braun gets a pass for last year, and to an extent, this year. But he's got to get better players. Let's give him a bit of credit for O'Brien at this point. We just need much more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baz=Heisman
I keep hearing grumblings from Wildcats Twitter/X that Fitz was a way better recruiter than Braun. That is simply spin.

I checked and Fitz had classes in the 50-55 range for the most part per Rivals (one of the last 6 years was 42, I believe). Braun’s 2025 class, his first full one, is currently 59. Is that really that much of a difference?

With our stringent academic restrictions I’m guessing, realistically, the high 30s/low 40s composite score is about as good as we can do. Not saying Braun will for sure get there but we’re not far off already…

Curious everyone’s thoughts.

The difference in recruiting has been significant. Far better under Fitz. Braun has a long way to go.
 
I keep hearing grumblings from Wildcats Twitter/X that Fitz was a way better recruiter than Braun. That is simply spin.

I checked and Fitz had classes in the 50-55 range for the most part per Rivals (one of the last 6 years was 42, I believe). Braun’s 2025 class, his first full one, is currently 59. Is that really that much of a difference?

With our stringent academic restrictions I’m guessing, realistically, the high 30s/low 40s composite score is about as good as we can do. Not saying Braun will for sure get there but we’re not far off already…

Curious everyone’s thoughts.
You are kidding yourself. There is a sizable difference. Rivals rates by number in the class among other things. This class is at 18 and bigger than Fitz's last classes (they were 16) leading to a higher rating. But those were also final grades and this years is not, Reality is that our class is probably complete where a number of classes of teams below us are not and when they add guys they will jump us. (really think IA is done at 14 or IL who just beat Mich and is ranked, will stop at 15?) The even bigger issue is much less high end, difference making talent.

Reality is that this class is more a MAC level class where Fits classes were about mid level P4. And as other programs fill out their classes I would expect this years class rating to drop.
 
Last edited:
You are kidding yourself. There is a sizable difference. Rivals rates by number in the class among other things. This class is at 18 and bigger than Fitz's last classes (they were 16) leading to a higher rating. But those were also final grades and this years is not, Reality is that our class is probably complete where a number of classes of teams below us are not and when they add guys they will jump us. (really think IA is done at 14 or IL who just beat Mich and is ranked, will stop at 15? The even bigger issue is much less high end, difference making talent.

Reality is that this class is more a MAC level class where Fits classes were more P4. And as other programs fill out their classes I would expect this years class rating to drop.
I mean we’ll see but Fitz had plenty of MAC guys. Damn near every QB post-2014 that he got was a MAC guy.
 
Braun is facing a couple impediments that Fitzgerald didn't really have to deal with for the bulk of his tenure.
Michael Schill and NIL.

Not sure which hurts NU football more.

Fitzgerald's genuine affection for Northwestern had to be helpful when selling NU to players and parents. (Yes the parents matter)
Braun is really just a positive guy trying to make a career for himself who can't really distance himself from Schill.

Fitzgerald, because of his status, was able to credibly promise development and assistance (possibly even "protection") to the guys he brought into the NU football family. Braun can't make those same promises because everybody knows Schill threw the whole team under the bus in 2023. And if they don't know, other schools will make sure they do know.

Additionally, what Fitzgerald was selling has also been undercut by NIL, so Braun faces a significant disadvantage there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack
I keep hearing grumblings from Wildcats Twitter/X that Fitz was a way better recruiter than Braun. That is simply spin.

I checked and Fitz had classes in the 50-55 range for the most part per Rivals (one of the last 6 years was 42, I believe). Braun’s 2025 class, his first full one, is currently 59. Is that really that much of a difference?

With our stringent academic restrictions I’m guessing, realistically, the high 30s/low 40s composite score is about as good as we can do. Not saying Braun will for sure get there but we’re not far off already…

Curious everyone’s thoughts.
If you compare classes player to player, offer to offer, battle to battle, it's not even remotely close. Fitz was routinely competing with and beating all but the top of the Big Ten in battles for guys, and he was doing it without the performance center or upcoming new stadium.

This isn't some dig at Braun, our program has needed some rebuilding and it'll take time, but Fitz was an absolute A+ recruiter at Northwestern.
 
If you compare classes player to player, offer to offer, battle to battle, it's not even remotely close. Fitz was routinely competing with and beating all but the top of the Big Ten in battles for guys, and he was doing it without the performance center or upcoming new stadium.

This isn't some dig at Braun, our program has needed some rebuilding and it'll take time, but Fitz was an absolute A+ recruiter at Northwestern.
Recruiting was by far the biggest strength of Fitz and at NU, recruiting needs to be the strength of the staff. Most kids don’t grow up an NU fan or dream of playing at NU, coaches need to sell it. I hope Braun and company are able to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baz=Heisman
Recruiting was by far the biggest strength of Fitz and at NU, recruiting needs to be the strength of the staff. Most kids don’t grow up an NU fan or dream of playing at NU, coaches need to sell it. I hope Braun and company are able to do it.
If you compare early Fitz to early Braun, it's less drastic, though Braun has some advantages Fitz didn't... but also some new disadvantages in NIL Fitz didn't have either.

I generally believe it Braun's ability to get guys excited to play for him, but we'll just have to see over the next couple of years. Last year's class wasn't really Braun's class and this year is just year one. Next year will be big coming off the nice year last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baz=Heisman
If you compare early Fitz to early Braun, it's less drastic, though Braun has some advantages Fitz didn't... but also some new disadvantages in NIL Fitz didn't have either.

I generally believe it Braun's ability to get guys excited to play for him, but we'll just have to see over the next couple of years. Last year's class wasn't really Braun's class and this year is just year one. Next year will be big coming off the nice year last year.

Last year's team was arguably motivated by the "Cats Against The World" more than anything. Braun deserves credit for harnessing that energy and resurrecting the defense.

Now the offense looks confused and the coaches often seem confused when we have the ball. The defense seems capable enough and reasonably coached.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Pile Driver
Braun is facing a couple impediments that Fitzgerald didn't really have to deal with for the bulk of his tenure.
Michael Schill and NIL.

Not sure which hurts NU football more.

Fitzgerald's genuine affection for Northwestern had to be helpful when selling NU to players and parents. (Yes the parents matter)
Braun is really just a positive guy trying to make a career for himself who can't really distance himself from Schill.

Fitzgerald, because of his status, was able to credibly promise development and assistance (possibly even "protection") to the guys he brought into the NU football family. Braun can't make those same promises because everybody knows Schill threw the whole team under the bus in 2023. And if they don't know, other schools will make sure they do know.

Additionally, what Fitzgerald was selling has also been undercut by NIL, so Braun faces a significant disadvantage there.

The University President seldom comes up in recruiting.
 
Recruiting was by far the biggest strength of Fitz and at NU, recruiting needs to be the strength of the staff. Most kids don’t grow up an NU fan or dream of playing at NU, coaches need to sell it. I hope Braun and company are able to do it.
Consistency was. We were a developmental program just like is claimed today but then they were working with higher level guys to start with than Braun will have to work with
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: corbi296
Mustn't criticize St Patrick. Go do a novena
Hilarious. In the last week we have had posters on here claim McCall, Jake, Cushing, were Coaching giants. Why is it so surprising that “St. Patrick” gets backing when these under performers do? EVERY game we lose the old coaches seem brighter.

Every game we lose our transfers become HOF players. Sully, TeRah, Fort Knox, Priebe to name a few that would change the fortunes of this squad.

If you can’t at least admit that recent Fitz classes OVERALL were better than we have seen so far from Braun then the discussion starts with a clear bias. Again, I don’t blame Braun on this fact yet, as he started in a very difficult place, but let’s not kid ourselves because we dislike St. Patrick.
 
If you compare classes player to player, offer to offer, battle to battle, it's not even remotely close. Fitz was routinely competing with and beating all but the top of the Big Ten in battles for guys, and he was doing it without the performance center or upcoming new stadium.

This isn't some dig at Braun, our program has needed some rebuilding and it'll take time, but Fitz was an absolute A+ recruiter at Northwestern.
How was Fitz an “A+” recruiter at NU? His classes were 45-55. Obviously, recruiting has a lot more focus and resources dedicated to it now but didn’t Gary pull 5 stars back in the day?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IGNORE2
How was Fitz an “A+” recruiter at NU? His classes were 45-55. Obviously, recruiting has a lot more focus and resources dedicated to it now but didn’t Gary pull 5 stars back in the day?
I’m not a recruiting expert but the tell for me was what other offers the kids who ended up coming to NU had. For the most part it was other BIG programs.
 
If you compare early Fitz to early Braun, it's less drastic, though Braun has some advantages Fitz didn't... but also some new disadvantages in NIL Fitz didn't have either.

I generally believe it Braun's ability to get guys excited to play for him, but we'll just have to see over the next couple of years. Last year's class wasn't really Braun's class and this year is just year one. Next year will be big coming off the nice year last year.


Last year, the team was designed to win. Braun was successful and keeping them on the rails and giving them something to focus on which allowed them to be successful. Definitely not nothing but not everything either. He did not have to put together and build the program

11 of the 17 recruits committed after Fitz was fired and Braun was elevated to the position. IT was mostly his class and that part of the class was mostly FCS level. That said he was forced to get on guys a lot later in the process than normal. This year they have been on it since the beginning. Recruiting is better but still only mostly MAC level. Coupled with the mass exodus of talent, they have a long way to go before they can have a competitive roster. So for now, they will have their work cut out for them just stabilizing the roster and that is still a long way from having a competitive roster. Hopefully they can but jury still out
 
How was Fitz an “A+” recruiter at NU? His classes were 45-55. Obviously, recruiting has a lot more focus and resources dedicated to it now but didn’t Gary pull 5 stars back in the day?
Because the other programs did not have anywhere close to the restrictions Fitz was recruiting under. He could only even look at 10 to 15% of recruits and at certain positions, even less. Then there were quirks in the rating system such as we generally had classes around 16 players whereas the rating system bases the class ranking on the top 20-22 or whatever the number (we kept them for 5 years and they exhibited less turnover so we never brought in as many as other programs. He set up a solid recruiting program and executed it pretty well and brought in the guys that were fits. Result, we always performed better than the class rating.

The system was a lot different back when Barnett was here. Not sure of what anyones actual ratings were but while still competitive they are probably not close to what is going on today. As far as the top guys that he brought in, I believe it was after the Rose bowl year. But a number of them left when he did
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT