Work-study isn't supposed to include landscaping jobs. It's supposed to help students mitigate the cost of attendance by providing students with work opportunities related to academic majors/interests. Of course, NU, like many other schools, skirts these requirements through the "less desirable" jobs you describe, but those jobs are not supposed to be work-study jobs.
But the complaint states outright that other positions were available and NU refused to allow him into any of those jobs. I don't know what the "Wildcat Internship Program" is - and Googling the phrase only brings up this complaint, so if it does exist, it exists under a different name - but "internships" should not involve picking up trash and leaves. The university should not be using unpaid student labor for tasks like that when they could be paying actual workers.
I get the feeling a fact may be lost in the conversation.
On page 22 of the complaint, it's described that Vassar requested an NU committee hearing after the timecard fiasco (under crappy conditions set by NU I may add - no lawyer allowed - how scummy). Anyhow, he won.
The Committee chose "'to administer the granting of the aid in a different manner than usual due to the unusual circumstances presented in this appeal.' In doing so, the Committee recognized that Johnnie 'had not come to Northwestern with the expectation that you would be doing maintenance work' and confirmed 'that it was very awkward for [Johnnie] to be at work while other student athletes were coming for practice.'"
I'm not providing this as an excuse for NU or to say the timecards shouldn't be investigated. It just seems this fact is missing in some of the previous conclusions.
Granted, this takes JV away from the athletic scholarship and some of those perks. That's supposedly some of the damages.