ADVERTISEMENT

A few observations

Thats crazy talk. Really bizarro-world.
I mean, I get it, some of you fellas think you are experts on these things, but I rely on the data and I get it right most of the time.

Face it, you're saying Collins is an idiot for benching Mullins and starting Ciaravino.
When the data and the coach see the same thing, thats convincing enough for me.
But I'm surprised Gordie thinks that Collins made a mistake.

No offense.
Any conclusions that led to Gelo being a better defender than Mullins seem to have been misinterpreted. Especially after last night.

No offense.
  • Like
Reactions: EagerFan

Can someone tell me why Blake Smith is in the game?

This entire offseason, there was a lot of buzz about how Smith deserved a scholarship based on his performance last season. Yes, he made some key mistakes, but two out of those three were questionable calls. At some point, you'd expect a player with that much time in the program to adjust and realize how the refs are calling it. That said, he still found his way to the line when NU's offense was stagnant, especially during those dead possessions, something the freshmen and anyone outside of Martinelli weren't doing late.

Gelo, on the other hand, struggled from the jump. He had turnovers on two of the first few possessions, and defensively, both he and KJ were getting exploited. Honestly, the argument that Gelo is a better defender than Mullins still baffles me. Smith is generally a solid defender and doesn’t force things offensively, which is a good thing. Those fouls will serve as a learning experience.

Collins made the choice to start the guy who's been in his defensive system for three years over players with just part of a season under their belt, who were getting torched on screens, drives, and switches. I don't have an issue with that decision, it makes sense. As for Smith’s fouls, I’m not bothered by the first two. It’s that third one that was really tough, and then we saw Gelo subbed in for offense soon after.

Yes, Smith’s lack of an outside shot allowed defenses to sag off him, but at least he wasn’t turning the ball over in crunch time and got to the line a few times. NU got the win, and at the end of the day, Collins is still the best coach this program has had. I’m going to trust he knows the game and his players better than anyone else in this fanbase.

They may not make Tourney. But still my favorite TEAM

Next man up! Mullins woke up from a month-long slumber. Fitzmorris keeps throwing wrinkles that make me want to see him play more minutes... the free throw form, baby! The flush! The jump hook! Blake Smith is ready to do another Reggie Hearn impression.

No team left on the schedule overwhelms us talentwise, even without Brooks. Heck, even without Leach, too, though not real interested in finding that out. Close it out on a 9-0 stretch? WHY NOT US??
Jeez I hope you’re right, I just can’t get excited about Mullins, it just doesn’t appear based on the eye test as well as his historical stats, that games like this are reproducible or can be consistent. I love that they found a way to win and hope they can continue to. Keenan appears to be reliable for a few buckets a game, and if not for a Hunger injury (Luke hasn’t seen action in many games and appears unlikely to), we may have never known. If they had just won one more they would carry a 5-7 record entering a winnable road game at Washington. But then they had some very close wins that could have gone the other way. Would love for the Cats to win Saturday, need Leach to somehow clear a potential setback. Fingers crossed.

A few observations

1) Coming up short against Wisconsin, a likely 4 seed as of today, without Barnhizer doesn't mean we're a bad team. Yes, we're probably somewhere between the 12th and 17th-best Big 10 team now but still a top 60-ish team in the country. We just play in an unforgiving league and came up on the wrong end of some close ones we needed to win. I'm not giving up on these guys making a run to some sort of postseason play.

2) As a Pacific NW resident/native, I'm loving the upcoming trip up this way even though they'll be late start times for most fans watching on TV. I'm happy to be able to be close enough to support the team in person, I'm driving to Seattle on Saturday and Eugene next Tuesday to attend both games.

3) There's been a lot of talk about Nicholson on another thread. EvanMiya has a metric called "Defensive Bayesian Performance Rating" (DBPR) that measures a player's total impact on defense (including how their presence on the floor increases the defensive performance of teammates). Nicholson is tied for 2nd *in the entire Big 10* in this rating with Danny Wolf, just below Morez Johnson. Looking at "on/off the floor" ratings, our defensive rating is 16.4 points better per 100 possessions with Matt on the floor than when he sits. No other player on our team is worth more than 4.6 points per 100 possessions on D, and that's KJ Windham who hasn't played much in conference games. Unsurprisingly, Matt leads our team in raw +/- and we outscored both Wisconsin and Rutgers by 7 points when Matt was on the floor. He's really important despite the lack of development in his offensive game.

4) This may be unpopular, but I don't think "making this Nick's team" is a winning approach the rest of this season. I hope Leach is at least considered option 1B moving forward as he's been playing very well. I like how Leach is able to dribble into good looks from 3 and from the elbow off of high screens, and I think those are much better looks than what Nick throws up 6 or 7 times a game. I love Nick but teams are starting to solve him a bit, and he's forcing shots that just aren't there. I like when the ball moves on offense and Nick is able to get into a move quickly after the catch. I don't like when he gets the ball at the arc and spends 11 seconds backing down a defender only to end up forcing up an off-balance leaner with 3 guys on him. Because he has this funky arsenal of moves it seems like he thinks he can improvise under pressure and it's becoming less successful. He's 18-for-53 the last 3 games, but more concerning is that he's 13-for-36 on 2-pointers. That's too many wasted possessions.

5) Gelo was horribad on Saturday, but he has to play. So does KJ. They're the future of the team. Get them minutes while still keeping the core of Martinelli/Leach/Berry/Nicholson. I used to be higher on Mullins but I'm coming back the other way. Mullins with the other 4 starters is our worst-performing lineup. Let's prioritize the freshmen and use Mullins when needed.

6) I think we'll be fine next year. The incoming class is good. We have two young guys who should take big jumps. Martinelli will be back. We'll have a wide open spot for a big man in the portal who wants to start in the Big 10. We've landed two nice guards out of mid-major programs the last two years, so hopefully we can do that again. I'm not gloomy about the future.
OP with some bad takes

Can someone tell me why Blake Smith is in the game?

Defense, believe it or not.
About midway through the second half Windham got pinned on a screen halfway down the lane while his man hit an uncontested three. I don't think he saw the floor again. He flashes an explosiveness on both ends that we might not have ever seen in a Wildcat uniform, but the fundamentals just aren't there. Yet. He is going to be a heckuva player and we need that to happen now, especially if Leach is down. But Smith was clearly the better option process-wise (outcomes may be a different story, but we won so learn from it) and is light years more under control with the ball and switching on defense.

They may not make Tourney. But still my favorite TEAM

Next man up! Mullins woke up from a month-long slumber. Fitzmorris keeps throwing wrinkles that make me want to see him play more minutes... the free throw form, baby! The flush! The jump hook! Blake Smith is ready to do another Reggie Hearn impression.

No team left on the schedule overwhelms us talentwise, even without Brooks. Heck, even without Leach, too, though not real interested in finding that out. Close it out on a 9-0 stretch? WHY NOT US??

Can someone tell me why Blake Smith is in the game?

In fairness, I’m not sure the first 2 were fouls. But he shouldn’t have been that close to the shooter. 3rd one was crazy dumb.
Yep, second one especially was not a good call, though you wouldn’t know it from Brian Butch’s color commentary. Never wished harder for Robbie Hummell on the call.

The mental mistakes were bad for Smith no doubt, but he looked confident and aggressive on offense. I did not see egregiously bad offense at all. He drew six free throws! If only Martinelli got that respect from the zebras!
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack

Can someone tell me why Blake Smith is in the game?

I mean, yeah, but when he’s so egregiously bad on offense, and makes two of those most inexcusable defensive mistakes, I can’t fathom what played into that decision.
In fairness, I’m not sure the first 2 were fouls. But he shouldn’t have been that close to the shooter. 3rd one was crazy dumb.
  • Like
Reactions: ThatkidfromHolland

I would like to understand…

The refs have been terribly biased against NU all season. I'm almost 70 years old and I have never seen a season like this in that regard.
We always get Larry Scirotto who is the absolute worst. He gets fired from his job as a police officer for being incompetent yet he keeps getting invited by the conference to #%*} up our games.
  • Haha
Reactions: Baz=Heisman

Can someone tell me why Blake Smith is in the game?

Last year, a lot of people were clamoring for Blake to be put on scholarship. Now we still get folks acting like it’s some bizarre decision not to play the Freshman. Mullins got abused for weeks here questioning his value. That doesn’t look too smart either. Gelo literally ****ed up badly 3 of the first possessions in the game. He tries hard, but he has been passed in the rotation by Mullins and maybe even Smith. I can’t remember the last time he scored, maybe he hit a bucket in the last couple games, yet Smith gets accused of being scared. Who scored more points today? Which one went to the hoop at least once? Pretty sure if he put up a shot in the last few sequences, he would have been crucified by everyone.

It’s the same thing every year. Freshman flash and then people want to see them more. Barney, Nick, and Big Matt famously went through the learning curve. They weren’t ready either and that turned out pretty good. Maybe just maybe CCC and the staff know what’s best in bringing along the Freshmsn. History says they do.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT