ADVERTISEMENT

ARRINTEN PAGE IS A ‘CAT!

It's way more interesting.

According to reports, a UCF assistant coach shopped himself and former 5* center Moustapha Thiam as a package, demanding a two-year guaranteed salary, above market for an assistant. Most passed, Cincinnati ended up with the center and asst coach.

This happened in mid to late April.

Arrinten Page had bided his time playing behind a last-year center who statistically was the same Page, but had more familiarity with the coach. Page was due to start in '25 - '26. Suddenly, he's back on the bench, filling in at best 8-10 mins. a game.

So he jumped. I believe to a far better situation for Mr. Page and his family. He's with a staff that has deep experience developing bigs. He's on a roster where he's the undisputed starting center. And he gets to display his skills in the Big Ten.

Justifiable, defensible, smart move.
Reading that story, I'm kind of excited for the guy. It had to stink to be the coaches second favorite. I could see CC and the staff making him feel like he belongs in a way he hasn't had since high school.

ARRINTEN PAGE IS A ‘CAT!

Let me state unequivocally: Nick was the best or second best Wildcat last year depending on how you value health as a skill.

That said, we are veering a smidge into “Hatteberg can’t replace Giambi because I know what a ballplayer is” territory.

As the statistical revolution matures in hoops every year, it is clear that the guy who takes the most shots is very often not the most valuable player on the floor. Nick got a lot of bad shots when our offense stagnated because his bad shots were and are way better than everyone else’s. I think that hurt him a lot in these types of ratings systems.
Points for solid Giambi reference!

ARRINTEN PAGE IS A ‘CAT!

When rating systems rank players in what Is a bizarre way to anyone with 2 eyes, you look at the methodology and try to determine a reason. Often reasons are given and they are ignored if they don’t fit a narrative. Honestly, any ranking system that Ranks Nick as the 5th most efficient player is garbage. It’s nonsensical. Don’t care to explore it further and waste time analyzing an algorithm. The Coaches and Media vote on all Big Ten teams, personally I certainly trust their voting than some ranking system that I believe the author won’t even claim identify the best players.
Let me state unequivocally: Nick was the best or second best Wildcat last year depending on how you value health as a skill.

That said, we are veering a smidge into “Hatteberg can’t replace Giambi because I know what a ballplayer is” territory.

As the statistical revolution matures in hoops every year, it is clear that the guy who takes the most shots is very often not the most valuable player on the floor. Nick got a lot of bad shots when our offense stagnated because his bad shots were and are way better than everyone else’s. I think that hurt him a lot in these types of ratings systems.

KAH=GOAT

The incredible thing is that she started the team from scratch. I still remember the story about her driving up Sheridan Road and seeing two tall, athletic women running up the sidewalk. She stopped and invited them to come play for her... and they contributed. She revolutionized the sport of women's lax (and became known as head of the "Evit Empire"!).

GOAT indeed
  • Like
Reactions: Alvious
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT