ADVERTISEMENT

Big Ten: 16-1

Also I might be crazy but... is this not arguably the best coaching staffs from top to bottom that the Big Ten has had in a long time?

I think pretty much every staff outside of UCLA (for obvious reasons given the offseason exit of Kelly) is solid whereas a couple of years ago I would have pointed to like 4 or 5 schools with coaches that were really questionable hires.

Maryland, Rutgers, Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana appear to have competent staffs at the same time, I'm pretty sure that didn't happen at any other point since Maryland/Rutgers joined the Big Ten.

(Yeah I know some haven't been at their spots for a long time like Nebraska or us or Indiana, but I feel more confident in the overall staffs than I perhaps ever have in this conference).

Agreed.
  • Like
Reactions: Rebel II

How are we not happier here?

I think part of it is the takeaways are simple and obvious (wow that front seven and those backers are good, the secondary was young but gained confidence before our eyes, the offense flashed potential but shot itself in the foot repeatedly too) but the projection of it is unclear (Miami is a genuinely good defense and sharp team, but it’s unclear how it’ll translate against teams with more P2 talent even if they’re less clean as Miami).

What was notable was how clean both teams played except for the two miscues by NU on snaps. The first interception was a tough pass but in a good spot that bounced off the receiver's hands. The second one was great D. Very few penalities. Plays were made but no one was blowing coverages, etc. Kicks were made. When teams play clean like that, particularly in the first game, that is a good sign of veteran, well-coached teams.

I thought Miami had good receivers but no one who could take the DB's to school like Casey Washington of Illinois did last year. So how good the DB's are against great receivers is still TBD.

Big Ten: 16-1

I think the score wipeouts are reflective of NIL. I don't recall so many 50-0 type blowouts since before scholarship numbers were cut. Zero upsets this weekend. Very unusual.
Also I might be crazy but... is this not arguably the best coaching staffs from top to bottom that the Big Ten has had in a long time?

I think pretty much every staff outside of UCLA (for obvious reasons given the offseason exit of Kelly) is solid whereas a couple of years ago I would have pointed to like 4 or 5 schools with coaches that were really questionable hires.

Maryland, Rutgers, Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana appear to have competent staffs at the same time, I'm pretty sure that didn't happen at any other point since Maryland/Rutgers joined the Big Ten.

(Yeah I know some haven't been at their spots for a long time like Nebraska or us or Indiana, but I feel more confident in the overall staffs than I perhaps ever have in this conference).

NU 13 Miami 6 - game thoughts

Doesn't it seem like NU is the only team that can't consistently put kickoffs in the end zone? Since last season occasionally I would watch replays of games during the 2023 and consistently NU's opponents were starting out 10 yards further upfield than NU.
Well, yesterday one did go into the end zone, however, those that didn't and were run back frequently were stopped well short of the 25. So I guess my question would be which result do you prefer?

Big Ten: 16-1

I think the score wipeouts are reflective of NIL. I don't recall so many 50-0 type blowouts since before scholarship numbers were cut. Zero upsets this weekend. Very unusual.
Speaking of upsets...I believe we can beat Michigan this season. Anybody watch their game? Very average. And I think our d is as good as theirs. Our qb possible better. Fresno not so good.

NU 13 Miami 6 - game thoughts

I thought that Wright's throws had plenty of zip. I never felt that the sideline throws were pick 6s waiting to happen. Perhaps I have low standards for zip as some NU QBs had noodles for arms.

The QB-center exchange will get cleaned up so I am encouraged by the offense going forward.

Special teams play was solid across the board. A kickoff landed in the end zone and coverage was smoothering. Obviously the missed FG was disappointing.

Doesn't it seem like NU is the only team that can't consistently put kickoffs in the end zone? Since last season occasionally I would watch replays of games during the 2023 and consistently NU's opponents were starting out 10 yards further upfield than NU.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT