First off, this isn't a B*tch post. Do I think Fitz is doing a great job? Hell yeah. But there are some questions I have that I'd like to hear some answers on.
1. Barnett recruited a top 15 class after one successful season with a crap stadium and a miserable AD in Taylor, and an Admin that was as tight as two coats of paint. The Albrieights #39 recruit, Harris', Anderson's, Benfley's, Brown's, Nyehnhuis'. He owned the best recruits in Wisconsin with Albreight, and John Navarre, etc. And the academic restrictions were maybe even tougher than what Fitz has to go through today. Without comparing how Barnett did it, and how Fitz is recruiting, what gives and why can't we get any Big League Top 100 studs? Granted our #1 recruit this year is great and a home grown dude but he is no better than a concensus #200 recruit. From there it drops off. And I don't buy all of the star rankings because close to 50 schools have 3.0 average star rankings whereas, back in the day, only about 30. There has been star inflation. But since Barnett got a top 15 recruiting ranking, why are we stuck at #45+ each year, at the end of the year? This suggest that we have room for improvement.
2. Smart schools. As I look at the private schools, I see suck programs like Duke and Vandy ahead of us this year with average star value. With a #1 practice facility in the nation, and a consistent solid program, what's the deal? While I can't fuss about Notre Dame or Stanford, or USC out recruiting us, isn't it fair to question why the Duke's and Vanderbilt's outgun us?
I admit I may be wrong, but just by looking at this, I'd say that Fitz is handicapped with stricter academic standards than Vandy or Duke. I don't mind that. I don't want problems here and I have no problem getting recruits who have to work harder over 5 years to get to a bowl game than a 5 star who muddies the program and leaves after 2. Not that a Christian McCafferty would muddy anything.
But the real stinker to my thinking is that Barnett actually did compete with all the top schools without even winning a bowl game. What gives? Something seems odd. And again, not a knock on Fitz because I like where this program is at. And as far as recruiting he is relentless and doesn't annoy me like Randy did or Carmody.
1. Barnett recruited a top 15 class after one successful season with a crap stadium and a miserable AD in Taylor, and an Admin that was as tight as two coats of paint. The Albrieights #39 recruit, Harris', Anderson's, Benfley's, Brown's, Nyehnhuis'. He owned the best recruits in Wisconsin with Albreight, and John Navarre, etc. And the academic restrictions were maybe even tougher than what Fitz has to go through today. Without comparing how Barnett did it, and how Fitz is recruiting, what gives and why can't we get any Big League Top 100 studs? Granted our #1 recruit this year is great and a home grown dude but he is no better than a concensus #200 recruit. From there it drops off. And I don't buy all of the star rankings because close to 50 schools have 3.0 average star rankings whereas, back in the day, only about 30. There has been star inflation. But since Barnett got a top 15 recruiting ranking, why are we stuck at #45+ each year, at the end of the year? This suggest that we have room for improvement.
2. Smart schools. As I look at the private schools, I see suck programs like Duke and Vandy ahead of us this year with average star value. With a #1 practice facility in the nation, and a consistent solid program, what's the deal? While I can't fuss about Notre Dame or Stanford, or USC out recruiting us, isn't it fair to question why the Duke's and Vanderbilt's outgun us?
I admit I may be wrong, but just by looking at this, I'd say that Fitz is handicapped with stricter academic standards than Vandy or Duke. I don't mind that. I don't want problems here and I have no problem getting recruits who have to work harder over 5 years to get to a bowl game than a 5 star who muddies the program and leaves after 2. Not that a Christian McCafferty would muddy anything.
But the real stinker to my thinking is that Barnett actually did compete with all the top schools without even winning a bowl game. What gives? Something seems odd. And again, not a knock on Fitz because I like where this program is at. And as far as recruiting he is relentless and doesn't annoy me like Randy did or Carmody.