+/- for the Ordination in Oregon
- By GatoLouco
- Wildcat Basketball Board
- 21 Replies
IMO this gets to the concept of what is a "good shot". Every single player needs to take good shots. Any player that passes on a good shot needs to be benched. Now, what is a good shot for Michael Jordan is not the same as for Dennis Rodman. Just like what is a good shot for Berry is not necessarily a good shot for Clayton. Take Hunger as an example, if it were me, by now, a good 3 pointer for him would be with his feet completely set, with time somewhat comparable to a free throw. No shooting in the flow of the offense, coming off movement, plenty of evidence that's not a good shot for him.This makes some sense. The opposing team's scouting report likely says, "Clayton can't shoot. Defender should leave him for double teams and rotational help." If Clayton has an early, open shot, he should take it. If he happens to make it, then he creates a problem for the defense which now thinks it has to guard him for the rest of the game. If not, oh well. Generally worth the risk. Clayton did not shoot much more after that initial shot which makes me think it was a defined strategy rather than "selfish" as you so objectively called it.
I am still to figure out what is a good shot for Clayton.