ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

OT: Legalizing Sports Gambling Was a Huge Mistake (Atlantic)

Purple Pile Driver
fcmchi said:
What about the integrity of the games? Since it will be almost impossible to monitor every referee/umpire, player, manager/coach betting will be effecting the outcomes of the games. Just a matter of time if it hasn’t happened already.

We NU fans had a taste of gambling changing outcomes in the ‘90’s. Dennis Lundy was caught up in that affair.

He even admitted in 1993 after the Ohio State game at Dyche Stadium to running to the wrong hole on the two point conversion that would have tied the game with almost no time left.

Was that a mistake or intentional so as to keep his legs from getting broken?
Click to expand...
Yes, there will be another scandal. Has been fixing going on for over a century.
NUCat320 said:
@AdamOnFirst , @Purple Pile Driver , were you avid gamblers prior to the launch of free, legal, online outlets?

I’ve had friends who regularly gambled through ‘their guy’ (I never investigated further), but it was mostly football Saturdays and Sundays, considered decisions, never spur of the moment. It was, say, part of the Friday afternoon routine. Weird, not my bag, but not particularly destructive or risky.


The primary problem with ‘the apps’ is that they’re so good at separating you from cash. Changing in-game odds, low-odd parlays, all built to make you feel good for making the bet, whether you win or not. So different from what it looked like ‘traditionally’.

I tend to come from the same place as @TheC*, where limitations on advertising, perhaps allowable bets per day, perhaps types of bets allowed on apps, would probably be good things.





*On most issues, I think I have a similar viewpoint to TheC, except that I don’t call for the OC, the DC, the Head Coach, the PA announcer, and the entire training and equipment management staff to be fired by the end of the first half. When the Cats are bad, it’s gallows humor for me only.
Click to expand...
The vast majority of my current sports gambling consists of fantasy sports betting not actual game play. I am also far more likely to bet player props than individual games. The lines are too good to make money consistenly. However, I believe if you are good at analyzing individual player performance coupled with some basic knowledge of team trends you can win at fantasy and player props.

The key is I NEVER bet more than I can afford to lose and I NEVER chase a losing bet with some in game non sense. It’s a hobby to me not a ways to wealth.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: FeralFelidae, NUCat320 and No Chores

OT: Legalizing Sports Gambling Was a Huge Mistake (Atlantic)

N
@AdamOnFirst , @Purple Pile Driver , were you avid gamblers prior to the launch of free, legal, online outlets?

I’ve had friends who regularly gambled through ‘their guy’ (I never investigated further), but it was mostly football Saturdays and Sundays, considered decisions, never spur of the moment. It was, say, part of the Friday afternoon routine. Weird, not my bag, but not particularly destructive or risky.


The primary problem with ‘the apps’ is that they’re so good at separating you from cash. Changing in-game odds, low-odd parlays, all built to make you feel good for making the bet, whether you win or not. So different from what it looked like ‘traditionally’.

I tend to come from the same place as @TheC*, where limitations on advertising, perhaps allowable bets per day, perhaps types of bets allowed on apps, would probably be good things.





*On most issues, I think I have a similar viewpoint to TheC, except that I don’t call for the OC, the DC, the Head Coach, the PA announcer, and the entire training and equipment management staff to be fired by the end of the first half. When the Cats are bad, it’s gallows humor for me only.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: FeralFelidae

Where we stand post-Washington debacle

N
NU is 2-2 after four games, having split in the way that all reasonable Cat fans expected.

Compared to mid-August,
Indiana looks tougher
Maryland looks the same
Wisconsin looks weaker
Iowa probably the same
Purdue looks weaker
OSU and Michigan both look like 1 in 100
Illinois looks better

And, Northwestern looks worse than I expected. I expected some dynamism in the offense, but neither Henning nor Kirtz have made many plays, and the tight ends have regressed, and the line questions have not been answered (or perhaps they have, unsatisfactorily).

ESPN lists Purdue (50/50 matchup predictor) and Wisconsin (56 for the Badgers) as tossups.

Illinois is 70%, Iowa and Maryland and Indiana both 80+.

Lots can change between now and the end of the year, but the fact is that it needs to change in the next 12 days.

I sincerely hope Indiana comes to Evanston 5-0 and ranked. That win would give the Cats nice momentum and nice publicity , and would probably not turn out to be as impressive at season’s end as it seemed at the time.

Getting ahead of myself? Yup.

Go Tigers Go Tigers Go
Click to expand...

Rationale on the goal line strategy?

H
PurpleWhiteBoy said:
If the intention was to concede the game and take the loss, while enabling the offense to score a few points - it was perfect.
Otherwise it was pathetic.

Admittedly not quite as pathetic as the subsequent possession when we threw 3 passes from the Washington 1.
But by then, the offensive coordinator had already told the offensive line that he had zero confidence in them, so it wasn't that surprising.
Click to expand...
The offensive line had showed him all night why he should not have confidence in it
Click to expand...
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back